Bad news for Kristen Stewart. It looks like her career really IS going to take a hit after she Mini-Cooper’d her married director, Rupert Sanders. In the immediate wake of the Sanders-Stewart scandal, it was widely reported that Kristen was still attached to a sequel of Snow White and the Huntsman, and although Sanders wasn’t contractually obligated to direct the sequel, he could and might do it. Well not so much, for some of it. The Hollywood Reporter says that SWATH will be getting a sequel, and that Rupert Sanders might have something to do with it but Kristen Stewart will not be returning. It’s just going to be about “The Huntsman” now. Which means another vehicle for Chris Hemsworth: Universal has decided to shelf its planned Snow White and the Huntsman sequel and is instead focusing on a solo Huntsman movie starring Chris Hemsworth.
Trophy Room, fixtures, results, ladders, statistics, news and events for the Imperial Football and Netball Club Inc., on SportsTG, the Home of Grassroots Sport Trophy Room Support Passport.
Kristen Stewart will not be invited to return if the follow-up goes forward. Sources tell The Hollywood Reporter that the sequel to June’s Snow White, which starred Stewart, Hemsworth and Charlize Theron, is being reconceived as a spinoff movie. It’s unclear whether director Rupert Sanders will return, though one source with ties to the production says he will. However, screenwriter David Koepp, who had been hired to pen the continuation of the original film, is being settled out of his rich contract, according to sources, as the project is being transformed into something other than the movie that Koepp had been hired to write. “The studio is currently exploring options to continue the franchise,” a Universal spokeswoman says.
![Mrs stewart stewart tg sapphire fox downloader Mrs stewart stewart tg sapphire fox downloader](/uploads/1/2/5/3/125356355/412513709.jpg)
The move comes in the wake of Stewart, 22, and the married Sanders, 41, apologizing publicly for a romantic affair after compromising photos of the duo were published in July. (Stewart was dating her Twilight co-star Robert Pattinson.) While it might have been awkward for Stewart and Sanders to reunite for a sequel, it is not clear why the decision to move forward without Stewart was made. It is highly unusual for Hollywood studios to drop stars of franchises between the first and second installments. The original plan, according to sources, was to make two films featuring the Snow White character and a third film spinning off the Huntsman, similar to how Fox’s X-Men series has spun off Wolverine. It’s far from clear whether a Snow White follow-up will ever get made. The movie was a modest hit for Universal, grossing $389.2 million worldwide on a budget of about $170 million. But Stewart, one of Hollywood’s top stars thanks to the Twilight franchise, commands a hefty salary.
Declining to pick up her option would shave millions from the budget of a second movie. Universal is looking for a new writer, and insiders hope to start filming in July when Hemsworth, who also stars in Marvel’s Thor series, becomes available.
The wording on this is very weird. At first, I really thought it was the studio completely behind this decision, but after re-reading the report I’m not so sure.
I think Kristen Stewart might have gone to the studio with some qualms about the sequel, and they were like, “Eh, maybe we just won’t have you in the sequel anyway” and Kristen rolled her eyes and said “Whatever, dude.” It just feels more like a mutual split rather than a studio bouncing Kristen from a sequel. It feels like Kristen is trying to pull back from roles that will “look bad” – like playing a trampy little thing in Cali, or working with Rupert Sanders again in a SWATH sequel. Maybe she just needs or wants some time off. Which might not be the worst thing.
Whenever a young actor gets in over their head, I always suggest it: take a year off, get out of LA, get out of your own headspace. Go travel the world, do some charity work and come back in a year, refreshed and ready to work. Kristen should do that. Photos courtesy of WENN. This situation may finally force her to grow up. For four years people tolerated her foul mouth and bird flipping because she made a lot of money for a lot of people. Now that she has done something so irreprehensible that the cash flow (fans, moviegoers in general) is drying up Hollywood is starting to throw her under the bus.
Stewart is now a cautionary tale for young Hollywood who think they can act a fool and have it all. They now see they can be one stupid incident away from losing everything. Will anyone learn?
But I bet this scandal has put a scare in some. Another movie, and rights for that movie bought just for him (by the same studio, Universal), as one commenter below told us.
Re: all of you who replied to Teehee (sp?)-those are his personal consequences. Stewart obviously suffered professionally (and personally), so the question still remains-what are the consequences, in business, for him?? And we still don’t know if Ross will divorce him-and I’m not their friend, so I really don’t know if he’s sleeping on the couch or going into therapy. I mean, HW marriage-we all saw what was behind Katie and Tom’s, who knows what’s behind other ones in HW? Stewart may have suffered professionally–that’s still unclear.
But what’s clear is that she’s enduring a very public, very bloodthirsty shaming. Whether she deserves it or not is a matter of opinion. My question is, why hasn’t Rupert been shamed as well?
Especially by those people who are shaming Kristen? He’s married, he has kids, he was Kristen’s titular boss in SWATH, why isn’t the media even briefly castigating his choices? I mean, if you think Kristen deserves shaming then you have to think Rupert does as well, right? “My question is, why hasn’t Rupert been shamed as well?” Are we still asking this question? RS is not getting the thrashing that he deserves because his public persona was pretty much non-existant prior to this scandal.
Kristen Stewart, on the other hand, has been in the spotlight for quite some time and has become Public Enemy #1 with a lot of people. People already had a very strong level of dislike for her prior to this scandal, so this is basically an Xmas present to those who already thought she was sketchy. It’s confirming what they already thought/knew about her and that makes people happy.
EDIT: I’m not saying that these people are happy that she had a hand in wrecking a marriage, just that they’re happy to see her go up in flames and get knocked off the proverbial pedestal. @ Bugs-you’re preaching to the choir here I was completely indifferent to KS before this scandal hit and frankly, I’m still indifferent towards her. I think what she did was effed up but it doesn’t make me hate her. I also agree that the majority of the onus should be on the man that made a false promise to uphold his vows.
I’m also not saying that misogyny doesn’t play a part in people’s reactions but I think women are quick to crucify other women, period. And I’m not speaking in regards to just cheating, I mean women skewer other women over their appearance, who they date, etc. We just have higher standards for each other than men do. It’s expected that we’ll do the right thing, whereas men are expected to act up. I’m sure we could go even further and expand upon the biological connection in the sense that women carry babies, men do not. Of course, then you have the counter-argument; that it’s not exactly in line with feminism to support other women who some might say are devoid of morals simply because we share the same gender.shrugs.
I still maintain that RS would be getting his fair share of sh.t (at least on this board) if he was, say, Brad Pitt. People feel like they know Brad Pitt-they have an investment with him that they don’t with Sanders. And I also maintain that if Stewart was more media-friendly, more fan-friendly, and more PR-savvy that she would generate more sympathy from people. PS: I’d still rather be a woman and have people expect more from me than to be a man and have others assume that I’ll be so weak-willed as to succumb to temptation. I think it’s a testament to women in general that intelligence, sensitivity and self-control are qualities that women expect from one another. @OrigKitten: You’re soso right. After all the Brange drama went down, I remember talking to a girlfriend about how their affair was portrayed–the fact that Ang got loads of shit and Brad, the married man, got none.
She said she thought that was appropriate–that when her husband travels for business, she expects the women he meets to respect his wedding ring. She was really clear about it: She expects random women to respect the fact that her husband’s married more than he does. I said, don’t you think that’s a little patronizing–the idea that your husband isn’t capable of upholding his vows on his own. And she laughed at me, as tho that were an absurd, hysterical notion. Original Kitten, I agree with you on most of what you said (ok,I like Stewart), but I wanted to add one thing: I totally look at this: “women expect women to have higher standards/moral/compassion than men” as something negative: it’s excusing men as children, with no responsibility and putting huge responsibility on our gender; also, I think that’s rooted in general insecurity and cultural history. It’s easier to turn against a woman, than man.
Even in this day and age. Even when the woman is highly-paid actress who played title role, and the man is some lowly and sleazy first-time director in full-blown middle-age crisis.
I am one of those who does not judge her we are far and in between. Jesus said, “he who is without sin may cast the first stone, It’s not for us to judge her, unless of course you are without sin”. Statistics show that there is a very hign percentage of cheaters, both men and women. Of course, it is more acceptable for a man to cheat than women. Just like centuries, ago.
And of course, CB had to put the picture with the finger to be sure to ignite the flames again, since they couldn’t learn anything new from Rob. I guess that’s why they call it a “gossip site”. Solet the one who has never had an affair let alone with a married superior cast the first stone.raises hand with stone firmly grasped in fist. My point is that as a woman and a feminist I have no obligation to stand in solidarity with a woman who has done something that I consider wrong. It isn’t misogyny; it’s the opposite. Women CAN make the wrong decision and SHOULD be held responsible for them because we’re not dainty flowers; we’re people and can and should be subjected to whatever castigation if we do wrong.
That’s my take, I’m tired of hearing people that would obviously support her no matter what use feminism, womanhood or some other logos as if that’s their reason when it’s auxiliary AT BEST. OMG THANK YOU!
In the words of Michael K, I have no more f8cks to give about this situation or these people, but I am SO SICK of people constantly bringing up this “he who is without sin BS.” I AM “without sin;” I’ve never cheated on anyone, not even the a88hole who cheated on me and beat me up, or done anything even remotely approaching this level of betrayal to anyone I love in any capacity. So, sorry, but I am perfectly qualified to “cast a stone” in this instance. I also agree completely that it isn’t anti-feminist to withdraw support from women who are a88holes. Shannon posted a Hitfix link down below which basically says that Universal has not committed to anything re: SWATH. Nobody’s been fired, nobody’s been hired, several drafts of the sequel have been bounced around. Basically, everything is still up in the air. The only that’s changed is that Koepp is officially off the project.
But what headline will get more hits: “David Koepp resigns from SWATH sequel!” or “Kristen Stewart is not re-hired for SWATH sequel!” The truth is that she hasn’t been hired (or fired) so I guess it’s not technically inaccurate, but it certainly is misleading. @Originaltiffany – i think we can safely say that this is the beginning of the end. As much as they try to gloss over it, he has looked unwell for quite some time. I honestly thought the Jubilee was a high point in an otherwise miserable 9mths. And the Olympics showing was horrible. Plus of course they always downplay these things so it sounds less than it actually is.
However, that’s the third time in 9mths and seeing that DoE is extremely stubborn and of the generation that soldiers on, we can safely say that a hospital stay for ‘observation’ is not good. I don’t want to think of what HM will do when he passes. Not just because of who she is but simply because of her age.
He has been her companion since 18. Knew all her family intimately etc. I was rather sad for her when Margaret and her mother died but losing DoE means she is alone. Until her death.
Her longevity genes give her probability of hanging on for quite some time. Old people like that should die together. @ LAK and OTiff I am so saddened by this. I absolutely adore DoE. Clan in GB and I have discussed this since his hospitalization earlier in the year. Although I would never wish anyone’s early demise, it is almost the kindest act for both in such a long term marriage to go one after the other.
I’ve seen both cases, and they’re equally sad. While I’m aware that HM’s death would be unthinkableto the world, reallyit’s just as mournful to see a woman of her age all alone. I will pray for the DoE and HM. Would that ANY younger members of the remaining RF were even remotely ready to rule. That family.:( A spoiled lot, God Save the Queen. “If they dump her it’s because they don’t feel she’s worth the money, plain and simple” Not quite. How could a Snow White story continue without the stepmother saga?
The stepmother battle is what DEFINES the character of Snow White. Ron Meyer (head of Universal) said in April before the movie came out that they were thinking about sequels, but obviously the Snow White story couldn’t continue and they would focus on the Huntsman. Being that Meyer said this in April, it is REALLY SHAMEFUL of THR to try and suggest that Stewart was “fired” or “dropped”. @MorticiansDoItDeader – her mother has worked for years as a script supervisor. That means she’s worked with directors for years and has probably learnt alot in the process.
Sure her directorial debut came when her daughter became famous, but so what? Don’t we all use the connections we have/get? In this case, it doesn’t appear to be a toxic use of those connections like some others can/have been. It’s the people who gave her the platform to direct who are being shallow in this instance because they think that by backing the mother, they can get a slice of the daughter.
I am not going to castigate the mother for taking advantage of the opportunity. @lak, that’s another way of looking at it. Although I’d prefer to get there on my own merit rather than ride anyones coat tails. People tend to have more respect for those who’ve earned their place (rather than those who’ve been given things because of who they are or who they know), and oftentimes those who work their way up are better at their jobs.
I have a “rockabilly” friend who looks A LOT like this. She’s a cheap beer swilling, bandana wearing, vintage car driving, tattooed mama. Mrs Stewart here reminds me of her. @MorticiansDoItDeader – Firstly, i agree 100% with what you have said. However, the saying ‘it’s not what you know but who you know’ is also true whatever your station in life. If a door opens because of your connections, why refuse to go through it? Isn’t that what networking is all about, to meet people who can open the doors for us especially if we were not born to it?
Some people’s doors are their relatives. Assuming they are talented hard working people, it doesn’t negate their success. Looking at Hollywood, most of the kids want a piece of their parents’ stardom and use their connections to try and get there, but how many of them make it? The only ones i can think of right now are GOOP and Kate Hudson. Drew Barrymore from a famous acting Dynasty had to fight her way into the spotlight after her golden opportunity was derailed by drugs.
Oh CT you said it so well! She is toxic right now and it isn’t just because up of her mini cooper munch session with Ruppy, it’s a culmination of all her antics and her attitude leading up to the big-event-caught-on-film-that-caused-a public-apology-that-labeled-her-a-home wrecker. Karma, you reap what you sow, you get what you give, every action has a reaction, KLewd is being held accountable. Oh, and I don’t believe for one minute that they will keep Ruppy involved. The studio is just beheading them one at a time.
This is almost media manufactured at tihs point, not a reality. The Universal head had already mentioned before SWATH even came out that they were planning on making the sequel a huntsmen spinoff since snow white’s story was done. This is old news, given a more fresh spin to dramatize the whole Scarlet Letter narrative that the public is enthralled with.
She nabbed Lie Down in Darkness in the midst of the scandal, and she still has strong industry ties. The media is milking the drama. Eta: Karma apparently doesn’t much power in hollywood, since Ashton Kutcher was actually rewarded with a sweet gig when he got caught cheating. His trick got a magazine cover to boot. Thank you so much for posting this link, Shannon!
I love Hitfix and I really really detest media manipulation/story distortion for the sake of sensationalism. This says it all: “I think people want to believe the idea that Hollywood is going to punish the sexually active young woman while rewarding the cheating husband. I think people like that version of the story because it allows them to rail about how sexually screwed up Hollywood is and how the institutionalized misogyny punishes actresses in ways that actors don’t have to deal with, and while all of that might actually be the case, this is not that story.” “Is Rupert Sanders a box-office draw? Is Kristen Stewart? When they’re making the big decisions on the next film, box-office is going to be far more important to that conversation that who did what with who in a marital indiscretion.” So in short the only thing that’s changed is Koepp is off the project. The Hollywood Reporter should be ashamed. @ Gen-with Tiff it was easier because her hubby is a well-known musician (drummer for Tears for Fears etc) so I searched his name, then found her, then FB requested Mort by finding her on Tiff’s page.
I think we’re all in the same boat as you-we enjoy the anonymity of posting here and I know that personally it’s taken me a few years posting here for me to feel safe revealing any personal details. But there are a core group of posters here that I really adore and I am thrilled to have them as FB friends Do you have your real name as your FB name? @Chat-your family is so adorable!
So neat to see pics of the boys that you always talk about. I dont know that this article makes it any different. They had a sequel to snow white planned. Thats now been put aside, The writer for that has been released from his contract.
And they are focusing on creating a spin off as a star vehicle for Hemsworth. It does seem like kristen is no longer an integral part of their plans. Which is more less the same thing. The studio would have gone with Kristen if they felt like that was the big money maker. Obviously they dont. The director probably wont keep the job either.
@ O Kitten: Yes, my FB name is my REAL namethat makes it not so easy for any of us to connect from a security point of view Maybe we could figure out a way to deposit info in different posts, instead of just throwing our personal stuff out there, so that we can hook up on FB? @ O Bella THRILLED you’d like to connect via FB, as you were one of the people I was going to try to link to, with your permission. I feel that some of you girls are pulling my very thoughts and experiences out of my brain in your posts, it would be nice to be able to chat via email or FB. It’s taken me a while to pinpoint some of you, but my biggest fear is having one of the.nasties.
who post here get my info. I could care less about Kristen Stewart. I haven’t seen or read any of the twilight crap. But the morality police here and elsewhere are making me sick.
It’s said at least half of married people commit adultery. I’m sure in Hollywood that statistic is much higher. I don’t know about any of you but I don’t want my entertainment censored by hypocritical puritans. Please no snide comments about me being a cheater.
I never have been nor have I been involved with a man involved elsewhere. So many celebritie’s careers continue to blossom after doing things far worse than cheating.
May I suggest just a few? Mel Gibson, Michael Jackson, John Travolta, Mike Tyson, Tom Cruise, Roman Polanski, R. Kelly, Michael Vick, Blake Shelton (animal killer and cheater). Some of these guys were only accused of crimes but many believe they were guilty. I’m sure there are a ton of women as well but these immediately came to mind. To make a list of actors who cheated openly while their careers thrived would take all day – you get my point. Just be honest.
Many simply don’t like this girl, find her ungrateful and arrogant, and probably resent the fact that someone so lacking in talent has become incredibly famous and wealthy. But please, enough with the moral b.s. Many of us love Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Penelope Cruz, Josh Duhamel, Jude Law, etc.
All cheaters with very few people praying for the destruction of their careers. Off topic but wanted to share: I just read that Christian Bale used Tom Cruise as inspiration for American Psycho. I never knew that but I love it! I bet there’s still someone who thinks this is all part of some super-convoluted plan. As for any sexism claim I’m betting right now Rupert will see a leprechaun before he sees himself directing that movie. Universal couldn’t publicly fire them together without hurting the brand even more.
Kristin gets the public shaft since she was supposed to be the big box office draw “She won’t be in the sequel, please come see it” and Rupert gets the quiet letter a few months down the line that cements “If you think we’ll trust you with our money or equipment ever again you’ve lost your obviously impaired mind” Yeah the cheating made them both douchebags, but more than that it showed SUCH a total lack of professionalism. This was the big break for both of them and now they both have this stain on their careers.
Kristin will forever get the casting couch side-eye and Rupert will be begging for whatever scraps any studio will give him. Considering this could have really helped him provide for his family and his actions have set him back years I’m really disgusted by him. Yeah, I think that’s a stretch. If movie industry execs didn’t want to make movies with douchebags or assholes, how would Michael Bay keep getting hired? It’s always about money. It’s a business. Yes, KS and RS are liabilities at the moment, but in a few months, who will care?
There will likely be many more scandals to entertain us by then. The whole “They’ll always be tainted professionally by this scandal!” drama is a bit much. Yes, they’ll both suffer consequences. I kind of doubt it for the long term. Yeah, I think that’s a stretch.
If movie industry execs didn’t want to make movies with d-bags or a-holes, how would Michael Bay keep getting hired? It’s always about money. It’s a business. Yes, KS and RS are liabilities at the moment, but in a few months, who will care? There will likely be many more scandals to entertain us by then. The whole “They’ll always be tainted professionally by this scandal!” drama is a bit much.
Yes, they’ll both suffer consequences. I kind of doubt it for the long term. @CC It’s not fair, but Sanders gets a break because he is not a name.
No one cares about him and his movies will sell or not sell on their stars and concept, not him. There are very few “name” directors who can spark the general public’s (not just the Internet crowd’s) immediate recognition and interest. Cameron, Spielberg, Scorsesse, George Lucas, Tim Burton, Peter Jackson, Christopher Nolan is there or almost there.
Those are examples of the “celebrity” directors who would see far more blowback from such a scandal. Personally I think Universal is underestimating the backlash on him though. The Twihards have long memories.
However if Sanders has a strong cast on his next movie, their “names” could cancel out his scandal. His lack of celebrity may save him. Again, Universal doesn’t care that Stewart cheated; they care if they can’t sell product on her name. @ Geekychick: ITA, in my mind a director is the master craftsman, they should be able to take a bad script, bad acting, wardrobe etc and make the finished product into something that is memorable for the right reasons. I’ve seen great directors work with sub-standard actors and bad scripts turn the final product into something masterful that people want to see again and again. These are the people that a studio, any studio, should employ. Bad directors can make money but this is usually down to the brilliant script, actors and FX and it is rare.
IMO bad directors should be shipped off to North Korea, they can start with Uwe Boll. Noooooooooooo.please nooooooo don’t send her here Seriously though she should look at doing something outside out acting for a little while, to put this behind her and also grow as a person.
I read somewhere that she loved the little dog RP has and helped him get over Parvo?? She could do something like that. I don’t know about the US but there are so many small, privately run rescues in the UK (one of them has a special place in my heart) that would jump at the chance for a celebrity to help them, not just for PR purposes, so I would imagine there are plenty in the LA area. Whatever she does, keeping it quiet and being subtle would be so beneficial for her right now (by subtle I mean no leaked PR and no photo ops, just maybe the odd pic in a newsletter or the odd photo op at a fund raising event). Well, I care and so should everyone. If it’s OK to cheat and engage in other similar behavior, then society as a whole stops having standards so everyone just does whatever they want without remorse or regard for the feelings of others. Sure, it’s none of my business what these people do but acting like it’s no big deal that this happens is ridiculous.
![Mrs Stewart Stewart TG Sapphirefoxx Download Mrs Stewart Stewart TG Sapphirefoxx Download](http://orig04.deviantart.net/af1b/f/2015/055/f/b/different_perspectives_page_22_by_sapphirefoxx-d8jdyvb.jpg)
Back in the “terrible” old days before everyone could do whatever they wanted (now it’s all DON’T JUDGE ME), people actually modified their behavior or at least thought long and hard before they did something wrong because there would be real-world consequences for their actions. Boy I’m sure glad we got rid of pesky notions like shame, respect for others and most of all, not judging anyone on their vile behavior! Yay progress, what a wonderful world we’ve built, where nobody gives a damn about anything but themselvesoops there I go judging again! Oh yeah I forgot where I was for a minutethe site where a woman is NEVER responsible for their actions, it’s that mean ole patriarchy keeping us down! And I never said that cheating DIDN’T happen, I said that people would maybe take the time to think about the consequences of their actions because there WERE consequences, unlike this great progressive equal society we live in. All “equality” has done is made women as nasty and uncaring as guys can be.
If you or anyone thinks that’s “progress” or something to strive for, then I honestly don’t know what to say. But I have that feeling around here a lot lol. Oh I know society is screwed up, my point is that WE THE MEMBERS of society, can choose what is or isn’t acceptable. If we make excuses for cheaters and continue to act like it’s ok, it’ll never stop. That goes for any unacceptable behavior.
I can’t control what others do but for myself, I never support anyone who cheats, steals, hurts animals or childrenso as you imagine I never EVER see movies and rarely if ever watch TV (lol yes I do own one but I would sell it in a second if my husband would let me) because I don’t want to enrich people that do things I find abhorrent. I know I’m probably unrealistic but I feel better about myself by not contributing to it. I hate to say this because well it sounds like I’m trying to defend K-Stew and I am really not. Over and over again people claimed that Rupert was getting an easier time in the media because he was less famous and I agreed because well he’s less famous. Then I thought for a moment.
About Michelle Bombshell, Rachel Uchitel, Monica Lewinsky, Rielle Hunter, Jessica Hahn, Donna Rice etc etc. On and on back the 30 years in my pop culture consciousness. Dozens of women whom became infamous soley for sleeping with famous men.
Yes some of them courted the fame some of them did tell all interviews and Playboy centerfolds but a couple did their best to keep out of the spotlight and still we all know their names and every detail of their lurid seductions of married men (eventhough Jessica Hahn claimed to be raped). So I am going to chime in with the K-Stew chorus not out of any loyalty to the lip-biting dunce. Why isn’t Rupert getting skewered in the tabloid press for being a scummy creep? I don’t think it was a mutual split, and when this whole scandal first came up, I said that this is what I’m afraid of: a career of a 22 year old young girl/woman/adult took a hit, and she was dropped from a movie, and a 40+ director who’s married (who didn’t get stellar reviews and it was his first movie) is good enough for the studio. THAT is misogyny in HW, and that’s what makes me upset.
I don’t really care about Pattinson or Stewart, they’re not my friends and I didn’t light a candle for them while sobbing and praying for their poor hearts, but I do care about the fact that “liberal” HW, in 2012., will drop a female lead bc she cheated on a bf, and keep the married man with whom she cheated with. I’m sorry, but Chris Brown has a career and is hugely popular-and Stewart gets booted.no words. I have a feeling she wants the time off, but if she doesn’t, I recommend European films: yeah, maybe they’re small budget and everything, but it’s more about art and craft, less about your virginal purity.
I have a feeling she wants the time off, but if she doesn’t, I recommend European films: yeah, maybe they’re small budget and everything, but it’s more about art and craft So, she just need two little things she didn’t have – talent and humilty. You said it, European films are about art and talent and she’s not exactly the Meryl Streep of her generation, especially when in Europe there are way better actresses at the same age – Few days ago I saw “Pure” and then I recall seeing “A Royal Affair”. I was impressed by Alicia Vikander. More bautiful and talented than Stewart. What a complete witch hunt. Some celebs have exhibited much worse behavior than cheating with a married man.
In recent memory. Even worse actresses (like that fake lesbian who hooked up with Johnny Depp). I don’t like KStew. If anything, I find her mannerisms, both on camera and behind-the-scenes, off-putting. I seriously don’t understand how she was even close to the highest-grossing actress.
But no way she deserves the hypocritical scorn she’s getting from her peers: they’re all cheaters, and few are much better actresses. How could Charlize et al WORK with Rupert with a straight face, knowing they ran out one but kept the other? And how could they write KStew out of SWATH without making it look like the Evil Queen won? Idiots, the lot of them. You can’t make a steaming pile of shit look better by removing one turd.
I think there is probably some ongoing misogyny at work here, but I really do not understand anyone drawing a parallel between the Meg Ryan/Russell Crowe situation and this one. I am fairly certain that Meg Ryan ruined her own career by deciding that she didn’t like being “America’s sweetheart” and wanted to be seen as a grittier dramatic actor – which she just is not. Also, with all the plastic surgery she’s had, she’s pretty much unrecognizable at this point. So I think that’s a totally different situation. As for KStew, I don’t care about her one way or the other, but the reality is that she’s not a terribly good actress and she’s been walking around acting like she’s above it all.
I think that drives a lot of the vitriol toward her. I do think she needs to get her head out of her ass and hire a more experienced PR team pronto, though.
Jodie Foster is doing her no favors. I honestly had an open mind about Kristen at the beginning, like most people. Then came the bratty images, the finger shots, seeing and experiencing her immaturity on talk shows, reading her interviews about how f. everything is, or how she wishes someone would f. her over, and then the scandal to top it off. She worked with the man’s wife next to her, and I wonder how could she do it to that woman? So, yeah, because of all of the above, PLUS the fact that Kristen is lucky to be acting at all because her talent is so small and she likely got into this biz due to her parents’ influence anyway.
Today, I think spoiled, untalented, immature and quite unbelievable that she would Mini Cooper the married director!! I’m just sooo glad that she was caught and this all came to light. I have never understood why women will focus blame on the woman that their man cheated with. I have always felt that the person at fault is the one that has made the commitment to me. She is not the one that has promised to love and care for me.There is no doubt that it is not right to be involved in any way with a person that is married or in a significant relationship. I often wonder what will allow a woman to be a side item in a mans life, for me I would not want to be with someone that lacks moral character.if you want to be with someone else do the right thing and end the first relationship. If the woman in question is someone that knows me.a friend or even an acquaintance then I’d be pissed at her too don’t try to be my friend and screw my man.then its on bitch right after I’m done with him.
That goes against girlfriend code and I expect my friends to be loyal to me. I give the sameany man my girl(s) have been involved with are off limits period. KStew is a little dirty if she was playing nice to the wife and doin the husband but he is the one at fault for ruining his marriage. On another note I am a little interested to know KStew is capable of any kind of risque behavior because she appears so robotic and emotionless in life or movies. She just always has that emo sad expressionnot someone I would think as a the “other” woman.